Victor Frankenstein: Insane or Sane?
Yesterday, during our
small group discussion, a group member mentioned something very interesting and
the thought has been on my mind for some time. So, I am going to blog about it.
She said, "I think Frankenstein made the whole story up". When she
said that I was at first, 'here's another girl who doesn't know what she is
talking about. Why would we be talking about this book if everyone thought
Victor was lying?' However, when I started to listen to what she had to say, I could
see the her viewpoint. I mean, both Walton and Victor were two very passionate
and goal driven people. And people who have strong desires and want to fulfill
those desires sometimes are just overcome by their pursuits and can have the
potential to go insane. Therefore, what if, just what if, Victor and Walton
were making this story up? It said in the book, "For this (creating the
creature) I had deprived myself of rest and health" (55). Victor was sleep
deprived; he didn't eat when he had to; he didn't go outside for two years. How
can a person living like that not go mentality crazed? Although Victor was
intellectual, he was, in a way, taken over by his intellect. The knowledge and
want of creating another creature and having the control over life and death
made him immerse himself in years of research in a secluded place. And although
he did attend college, the book does not mention any friendship being built.
Victor voluntarily secludes himself from society and family. Maybe the story
that he is telling Walton is just a fiction that he dreamed of because the
trauma of creating the creature was too much to handle and damaged his brain.
Also, Walton may be suffering from some kind of insanity as well and thought
that he saw the monster on the ship. This preposition makes sense. After all,
if Victor’s narration is false, then who other than Walton “saw” the monster?
Walton also “voluntarily endured cold, famine, thirst, and want of sleep”. He
was just like Victor in so many levels, so he could also suffer from the same
mental failures as well. Also, perhaps Mary Shelley wanted to show that if an
individual pursues a journey that goes against the natural ways of the world,
it has the potential to ruin the person socially, morally, and physically. It
took me a while to digest her preposition because the thought never occurred to
me, and I had a firm belief in Victor’s sanity. However, once she spoke of the
possibility of a fabricated story, I could not help myself from wondering and questioning
whether I had perceived the story wrong. It is very fascinating how the book
can be perceived and interpreted in so many various ways and levels. How one
preposition can totally take me to another route in looking at the book is, in
my opinion, the beauty of literature.
No comments:
Post a Comment